|
|
| |
 |
| |
This illumination
entered Casa Buonarroti in the 1930s. The fact that it was once part
of the Medicean collections has recently been confirmed by Silvia
Meloni trkulja, who has shown that it was one of the precious objects
from her family collection that Vittoria della Rovere brought as a
dowry to Ferdinando II dei Medici on the occasion of their marriage.
Thus the parchment became the property of the Medici family along
with several other illustrious acquisitions, including Titian's Venus
of Urbino and the double portrait of the Duke and Duchess of Urbino
painted by Piero della Francesca.
The Judgment in the Sistine Chapel, as Giovanni Agosti has pointed
out, "appeared, to Vasari's eyes, to have a 'finish unrivaled
by any miniature.' And this was no small praise, among the many that
were heaped on Michelangelo's masterpiece, given that it was made
at a time when the precious and extremely intimate works of Giulio
Clovio were all the rage in Europe, and the illumination was experiencing
its last period of glory. Thus a miniature depicting the Judgment
ran the risk of turning into a display of uncommon virtuosity: that
of reducing almost two hundred and fifty square meters of fresco with
three hundred and ninety one figures to a small square of parchment.
" And yet none of them are missing from the miniature: all the
original nudes can be seen, including the group that created the most
scandal, St. Blaise with the brushes in his hand eyeing St. Catherine
on the wheel (on the far right, in the middle): a group that was not
just provided with "breeches" but actually repainted by
Daniele da Volterra in 1565.
The illumination is almost identical to the engraving of the Judgment
that was made by the Dalmatian Martino Rota in 1569, though not directly
from the original. Yet the variations are significant. And rather
than variations, they seem to be corrections, and not gratuitous ones,
if we recall the extent to which, on its appearance, every detail
of this work of Michelangelo's was subjected to iconographic scrutiny,
from both the formal and theological perspective. Christ for instance,
has been given back his beard, whose absence in the fresco drew much
criticism (note that Christ is also bearded in the large picture by
Alessandro Allori hanging in the same room of the Casa Buonarroti
and reproducing the central group of the Judgment). At the top of
the illumination, where a portrait of Michelangelo appeared in Rota's
print, are set God and the Holy Spirit, in deference to the prescriptions
of the Counter Reformation. The stylistic features of the work point
in the direction of Giulio Clovio, the most important illuminator
of the sixteenth century. It seems possible to recognize, though somewhat
attenuated by its execution by the workshop, the "manner of working
in dots, which I call atoms, that like a finely woven veil resemble
a cloud laid over the painting, " as Francisco de Hollanda so
clearly characterized Clovio's style. |
| |
| BACK |
| |
|