|
|
| |
The
drawing is unanimously recognized as one of the finest and most important
of Michelagelo's entire graphic production. The bowed head, portrayed
in profile, is reminiscent of the pose of the figure of Night in the
New Sacristy, and displays a splendid sureness of touch made vibrant
by the obvious fact that it was drawn from life. Wilde was the first
to suggest that the model was Antonio Mini, one of the artist's pupils,
and this has been accepted by the majority of scholars. There is no
need to point out how common it was for male models to be used for
images of women in those days. What should be stressed, however, is
the way that the sketch, at bottom left, of the detail of nose and
eye, with long and feminine lashes, softens the already gentle and
thoughtful features of the profile. Scholars are also in agreement
in referring the drawing to the Leda, the lost painting that is connected
with some crucial moments in Michelangelo's life and bound up with
a complicated story of his relations with Alfonso d'Este, Duke of
Ferrara, and Pope Julius II. Excommunicated in the summer of 1510
for having chosen, as an adversary of Venice and ally of King Louis
XII of France, the opposite side to that of the pope, Alfonso, following
the unexpected defeat of the French in Italy just two years later,
decided to submit and went to Rome, where he obtained papal absolution.
Three days afterward, on July 11, Julius II allowed him to climb onto
the scaffolding of the Sistine Chapel, whose ceiling had by this time
been almost completely frescoed by Michelangelo.
The following long conversation between the artist and the Duke, who
was ecstatic with admiration, ended with a promise by Michelangelo
to paint a picture for him. Seventeen years later Michelangelo, who
had been given responsibility for the defenses of Florence, under
siege by the papal forces, was in Ferrara as Alfonso's guest to study
the city's famous fortifications, and allowed himself to be persuaded
to fulfill the duke's long-standing desire. It may have been the need
for him to remain in hiding after the fall of Florence, in August
1530, that allowed him to give his attention to the work. By around
the middle of the following September, the "parlor picture"
was finished. Yet it never reached Ferrara owning to the ignorance
of the messenger sent by the duke to fetch it, who described the painting,
to its author face, as "nothing much".
Michelangelo was enraged by this and, as we are told by Condivi, "shortly
after the departure of the ducal messenger, gave the picture to one
of his apprentices." This apprentice was Antonio Mini, who, in
addition to the Leda, seems to have received several drawings and
the preparatory cartoon for the painting from Michelangelo. It has
also been supposed, with some justification, that the painting was
given to Mini not as a gift but to be sold. The fact remains that
Mini was in France between 1531 and 1532, and that the Leda was undoubtedly
in his possession. After his death (1533), there are conflicting records
of further disputes over the painting. According to Vasari, it ended
up in the collections of Francis I at Fontainebleau. All trace of
it was soon lost, however. Yet Michelangelo's extraordinary invention,
of which this drawing was a luminous presage, has come down to us
through numerous copies and derivations in a wide variety of media,
including the famous painting in the National Gallery of London, attributed
to Rosso, and even a small panel from the end of the sixteenth century
that is currently on show at Casa Buonarroti. |
| |
| BACK |
| |
|